← Search

Mike Tichacek

Miami, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
502 matches · 299W–203L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mike Tichacek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history502 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Court Crushers at Alper JCC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with ELIANA BIGAI mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Broward/Goetz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Goetz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · with Alison McLaughlin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Alison McLaughlin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Alison McLaughlin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Alison McLaughlin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-12 · Broward/Goetz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lory Sakay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-22 · Broward/Goetz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Goetz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-17 · Marion/Barlet · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irina Madorsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-15 · Broward/Goetz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jenny Harrison mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-11 · Lhp/Pollitt · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Tiernan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-08 · Broward/Goetz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gina Goetz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
21%
13W–49L · 32.5% of games
3.5
27.8%
22W–57L · 34.8% of games
4.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 37.4% of games
6.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.9% of games
7.0
53.7%
29W–25L · 46.8% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 65.5% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.8%
62W–12L · 66.3% of games
7.0mixed
77.3%
102W–30L · 65.3% of games
8.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
159 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
155 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
140 matches
#2 Singles
6%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe