← Search

Richard Strange

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Salina, KS
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
60 matches · 20W–40L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history60 matches
W
2026-10-11 · Jim Bauersfeld/KS/7.0 M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Warkentine
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-10 · Jim Bauersfeld/KS/7.0 M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Warkentine
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-10-09 · Jim Bauersfeld/KS/7.0 M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Warkentine
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · Strange-Salina · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mibin Joseph
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · Strange-Salina · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Carlgren
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-28 · Strange-Salina · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Pigg
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · Strange-Salina · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Carlgren
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · Strange-Salina · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with GLEN COXON
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-11 · Jim Bauersfeld/HOA · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Ackerman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-11 · Jim Bauersfeld/HOA · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Bauersfeld
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 7-6
W
2025-10-10 · Jim Bauersfeld/HOA · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy McManus
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 7-5
L
2024-12-07 · Bauersfeld-Topeka · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Lemmon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.2% of games
3.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 34.9% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.5% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.7% of games
8.0
40%
4W–6L · 44.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.2% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams