← Search

James Munsil

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Florence, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 2W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history20 matches
L
2026-04-11 · 8.0 CTC The Brotherhood M65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Englund
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-07 · 8.0 CTC The Brotherhood M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Bowles
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · 8.0 CTC The Brotherhood M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Bowles
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
John Daniel Hopkins / George Orchard
2025-03-22 · 8.0 PTC The Generals M65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randy Englund
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
John Daniel Hopkins / Cory Levetan
2025-03-09 · 8.0 PTC The Generals M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Turoczy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-02-01 · 8.0 PTC The Generals M65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Turoczy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2023-03-24 · 8.0 PTC Old Time Winners M65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Lampman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-17 · 8.0 PTC Old Time Winners M65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Lampman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-04-01 · 8.0 PTC Lapane M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Daniel Hopkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2022-03-18 · 8.0 PTC Lapane M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Daniel Hopkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2022-03-11 · 8.0 PTC Lapane M65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Marshall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-04-02 · 8.0 PTC Davis M65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael McDowell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
10%
2W–18L · 34.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert