Search

Richard Crossley

Blair, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
133 matches · 66W–67L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.70
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams68 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Richard has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Richard has gone from the 89th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 52% of games
4.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.1% of games
8.0
75%
15W–5L · 56.4% of games
9.0
40%
8W–12L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 50.6% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history133 matches
L
Josh Eveloff / Douglas Stuva
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Merrill
0.008about as expected — took 45% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Stephen Collins / Ryan Ossell
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Merrill
+0.029better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Lorry Lazenby / Joe Vincentchamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Matthew Westfall
0.047below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Joseph Costigan / Patrick Costiganchamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with David Schmidt
0.033below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
James Hipkiss / Marty Abilezchamps
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with Philip Cook
+0.033better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Eric Bligard / Fred Pedersenchamps
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with David Schmidt
+0.056better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Trevor Davis / Steve Sanders
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jimmy Manion
0.043below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Todd Bircher / Steve Warner
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shahab Abdessalam
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Ryan Ossell / Jeff Fredricks
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Reid
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · WHRC-Stutzman/Lave · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Thayer
+0.015about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · WHRC-Stutzman/Lave · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Moreno
+0.002about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Jason Dean / Mark Orr
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shahab Abdessalam
+0.016better than expected — took 57% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.