← Search

Richard Crossley

Blair, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 66W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Richard Crossley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Merrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Merrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Lorry Lazenby / Joe Vincent
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Matthew Westfall championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Joseph Costigan / Patrick Costigan
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with David Schmidt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
James Hipkiss / Marty Abilez
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with Philip Cook championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Eric Bligard / Fred Pedersen
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with David Schmidt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jimmy Manion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shahab Abdessalam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Jonathan Barg / Jeffrey Krum
2026-04-23 · WHRC-Stutzman/Lave · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Thayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Thomas Lockhart / Robert Ferek
2026-04-17 · WHRC-Stutzman/Lave · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tony Moreno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Jason Dean / Mark Orr
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shahab Abdessalam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 52% of games
4.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.1% of games
8.0
75%
15W–5L · 56.4% of games
9.0
40%
8W–12L · 47.5% of games
8.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 50.6% of games
9.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer