← Search

Pamela Steinhauser

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CHAGRIN FALLS, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 66W–52L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history118 matches
L
2026-07-13 · NEO/Mazzola/A55&Over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nancy Hill
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-06 · NEO/Mazzola/A55&Over9.0W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sara Stehlik
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-22 · A55 9.0W KI Mazzola · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katy Hirst Lucci
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-17 · A40 4.0W 4 AVB Hendricks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Kekel
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-08 · A55 9.0W KI Mazzola · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Traci Davis
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-17 · A55 9.0W KI Mazzola · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Katy Hirst Lucci
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-06-03 · A55 9.0W KI Mazzola · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patricia Hirsch
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-05-15 · A40 4.0W 4 AVB Hendricks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Hopps
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-14 · TRI 3.0W AVB Kerosky · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Camilla Hill
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-08 · TRI 3.0W AVB Kerosky · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Aey
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-01-12 · TRI 3.0W AVB Kerosky · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Aey
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2024-07-31 · Greensburg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Moose
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 54.3% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.7% of games
8.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 59.2% of games
8.5
50%
11W–11L · 50.4% of games
9.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.2% of games
8.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal