Iris Marks
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Phoenix, AZ
143 matches · 59W–84L · seasons 2018–2024
Match history143 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2024
8.0 GK Schneider W55F
8.0 GK Schneider W55S
8.0 GK Linderson W55F
8.0 GK Schneider W55S
8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S
7.5W GK Linderson TueAM
8.0 GK CoxLind W55S
8.0 GKRC CoxLinderson W55F
8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S
4.0 PTC Schneider W18F
8.0 GK Cox W55F
8.0 GK Cox W55S
8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S
4.0 MVCC Stafin-Lewis W40F
4.0 MVCC Stafin-Lewis W40S
4.0 PTC Schneider 18eaF
4.0 PTC Schneider W18S
4.5 MtnView Edwards/Miller dayS
8.0 GK Linderson W55F
8.0 GK Marks/Linderson W55S
8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S
4.0 PTC Abrams/Stafin-Lewis 40F
4.0 PTC Schneider 18eaF
4.0 PTC Schneider 18eaS
4.0 PTC Stafin-Lewis W40S
8.0 GK Linderson W55S
8.0 GoldKey Linderson 55F
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
59.6%
28W–19L · 53.4% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games
8.0
31.1%
28W–62L · 44.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.