← Search

Chuck Roman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mentor, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 111W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history191 matches
W
2026-10-24 · X55 6.0 CV1 Lockert · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Paskevich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-10-18 · X55 6.0 CV1 Lockert · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Paskevich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-04 · X55 6.0 CV1 Lockert · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Paskevich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-10-02 · FD 6.0 MV Ung · #1 Male Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Brockman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Jones championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Jones championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Gustafson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · A65 6.0M CV Oler · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Timothy Feller
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · A65 6.0M CV Oler · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Florencio Marquinez
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · A55 7.0M MV2 Falcone · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yuri Borsch
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-20 · A55 6.0M MV Miluk · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roy Saenz
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · NEO/Goldstein/A65&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Frey
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.5% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.2% of games
6.0
75%
15W–5L · 61.7% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
55.4%
41W–33L · 55.1% of games
7.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.6% of games
6.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 54% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.8%
24W–19L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King