← Search

Bob Madson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BRIDGEPORT, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 22W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Howard Siegal championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-10 · PATD/Logan 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Howard Siegal
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-09-08 · PATD/Logan 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Lieberman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-29 · Fuzzy Balls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Snellenburg championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · Fuzzy Balls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Snellenburg
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Default
2026-08-14 · PATD/Logan 65+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Purcell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · Fuzzy Balls · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jimmy Kaufman
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · Fuzzy Balls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tyrone Aguillard
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · Doylestown 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandon Dinh
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-18 · PATD/Logan 65+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Katzenberg
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Doylestown 4.5 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Donahue
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kenneth West
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
100%
5W–0L · 65.6% of games
4.5
20.7%
6W–23L · 38.3% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 56.4% of games
9.0
0%
0W–10L · 27.3% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 35.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
26 matches
Singles
19%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams