← Search

Jim Ruxer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 55W–33L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history88 matches
L
2025-03-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Fuller
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Beaty
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-02-06 · CIN A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Ruxer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-01-23 · CIN A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Ruxer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-11-06 · CIN A40 3.5M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Burnett
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-09-18 · CIN A40 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Apoorva Desai
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2024-07-17 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 M, Gupta (IRC-D) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cliff Dickinson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Beaty
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-06-19 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 M, Gupta (IRC-D) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Beaty
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Fuller
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-05 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 M, Gupta (IRC-D) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Beaty
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-05-22 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 M, Gupta (IRC-D) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neal Burnett
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2025
CIN A18 3.5M IRCD Singh
Winter USTA Central Indiana Adult 18 & Over · CIN Indy 18 & Over 3.5 Men, W · 18+
2025
CIN A40 3.5M IRCD Singh
Early Start Fall CIN Indy Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.5 Men, F · 40+
2025
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 M, Gupta (IRC-D)
Fall CIN Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.5 Men, F · 40+
2024
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 M, Gupta (IRC-D)
CIN Adult 18 & Over, Winter · CIN Indy 18 & Over 3.5 Men, W · 18+
2020
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.5 M, Gupta (IRC-D)
CIN Summer 18 & Over Alternative League · 3.5 Men · 18+
2020
CIN Indianapolis, A55&O 7.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D)
CIN Adult 55 & Over, Spring · CIN Indy 55 & Over 7.0 Men, W · 55+
2020
CIN Indianapolis, A55&O 8.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D)
CIN Adult 55 & Over, Spring · CIN Indy 55 & Over 8.0 Men, W · 55+
2020
CIN Indianapolis, M18&O 8.0, Kim (IRC-D)
CIN Summer Mixed Alternative League · 8.0 Mixed
2020
CIN Indianapolis, M40&O 8.0, Kim (IRC-D)
CIN Mixed 40 & Over, Spring · CIN Indy Mixed 40 & Over 8.0, W · 40+
2020
Processed 8.10.20
USTA Central Indiana Mixed 18 & Over, Summer · Removed M18&O Summer · 18+
2020
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 M, Gupta (IRC-D)
Fall CIN Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.5 Men, W · 40+
2019
CIN Indianapolis, A55&O 8.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D)
Spring CIN Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 8.0 Men, W · 55+
2019
CIN Indianapolis, A55&O 8.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D)
Summer USTA CIN Adult 55 & Over · CIN Indy 55 & Over 8.0 Men, S · 55+
2019
CIN Indianapolis, M18&O 8.0, Kim (IRC-D)
Winter CIN Mixed 18 & Over · CIN Indy Mixed 18 & Over 8.0, W · 18+
2019
CIN Indianapolis, M40&O 8.0, Gupta (IRC-D)
Spring CIN Mixed 40 & Over · CIN Indy Mixed 40 & Over 8.0, W · 40+
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
65.3%
32W–17L · 55.9% of games
7.0
70%
14W–6L · 59.1% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.3% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams