← Search

Adam Warner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Belle Mead, NJ
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 4W–9L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history13 matches
L
2024-06-29 · Perth Amboy Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Pollack
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2024-06-15 · Perth Amboy Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cisco Mulero
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-05-11 · Perth Amboy Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Pollack
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Pollack
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2023-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yun Shao
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-07-13 · Courtsiders · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-08 · Courtsiders · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-01 · Courtsiders · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2022-05-25 · Courtsiders · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-0
L
2022-05-18 · Courtsiders · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2021-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
W
2021-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chauncey Herring
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
30%
3W–7L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer