← Search

Preston SMITH

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jackson, MS
3.0M year-end 2025
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
37 matches · 6W–31L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history37 matches
L
2026-07-07 · Smith, Autumn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Smith mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Smith, Autumn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Ewing mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-30 · Smith, Autumn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geri Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
L
2025-06-16 · Smith, Autumn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Ewing mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-09 · Smith, Autumn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Ewing mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-19 · Smith, Autumn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Claire mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-12 · Smith, Autumn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Autumn Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-11 · Smith, Parker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geri Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-25 · Warren, Malinda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geri Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-18 · Warren, Malinda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geri Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-11 · Warren, Malinda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geri Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-30 · Smith, Parker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geri Smith mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.9% of games
3.5mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 33.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
6.7%
1W–14L · 33.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams