← Search

Nancy Williford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naperville, IL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
286 matches · 142W–144L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history286 matches
L
2026-10-17 · NITA E 70W55e Rush Copley-Gudeon/Wolf · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Country
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-03 · NITA E 70W55e Rush Copley-Gudeon/Wolf · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Lloyd
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-5
W
2026-09-26 · NITA E 70W55e Rush Copley-Gudeon/Wolf · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Wolf
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-1
L
2026-08-15 · NITA S 70W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicky Ramuta
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · NITA S 70W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Martinez
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-13 · NITA S 70W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicky Ramuta
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-01 · NITA S 70W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Gudgeon
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · NITA W 70W65b Naperville-Martinez · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Vardas
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · NITA W 70W65b Naperville-Martinez · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roseann Solak
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-5
L
2026-04-18 · NITA W 70W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Golz
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-22 · NITA W 70W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Jerndt
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · NITA W 70W55a Rush Copley-Adams · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Jerndt
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
53.8%
28W–24L · 52.3% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
7.0
50.8%
93W–90L · 49.6% of games
7.5
10%
1W–9L · 37.1% of games
8.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.2% of games
7.0mixed
68.4%
13W–6L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
131 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
64 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams