Search

Colleen Stroeder

Surprise, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
70 matches · 18W–52L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.19
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
AZ · 3.5
5 of 6

Colleen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Colleen has been a steady 4.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.54.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–14L · 38% of games
7.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 48.6% of games
8.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.4% of games
8.0mixed
22.2%
4W–14L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
L
Jen Arntzen / Maura Houston
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Churchman
0.024below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Eileen Urbanowski / Linda Smith
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Augustine
0.047below expectation — took 27% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 2-1
W
Holly Cardinali / Cynthia Shaw
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Augustine
+0.038better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Kristina Kehm / Kelly Yunis
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Carpenter
0.039below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Melinda Muller / Alison Hall
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Carpenter
+0.016better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Barbara Hess / Jo Ellen Shield
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Augustine
0.010about as expected — took 44% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Carolyn Cheverine / Winnie Joy Bareng
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Augustine
+0.020better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Jami Gamez / Nora Swift
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bluml
+0.048better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Barbara Hess / Jo Ellen Shield
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bluml
0.012about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Sandy Durrell / Susan Heller
2026-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bluml
+0.010better than expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Diane Allard / Terese Shanley
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Villanueva
0.058below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Sylvia Sussman / Susan Welsh
2025-12-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Bluml
+0.037better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.