← Search

Patricia Shaw

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 38W–76L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history114 matches
W
2026-07-09 · PCRK BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Gilmore
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-17 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Olney
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · PCRK BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-10 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Klein
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · PCRK RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Gilmore
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Wichlens
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-15 · EM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Olney
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-14 · PCRK RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Gilmore
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-23 · PCRK RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Gilmore
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-04 · MC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Morris
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-05-28 · MC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Pomerantz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-05-14 · MC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Weaver
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
3.5
45.3%
29W–35L · 46.7% of games
4.0
14.3%
3W–18L · 34.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.6% of games
8.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
22 matches
#1 Singles
17%
19 matches
Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert