← Search

Conrad Frey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wilmington, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 11W–3L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history14 matches
W
2024-04-27 · ELROD · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rod Badakhsh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
W
2024-04-06 · ELROD · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Boney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-04-15 · elrod/baggett · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Will Head
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 7-6
W
2023-03-13 · elrod/baggett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kenny House
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-04-20 · elrod/baggett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kenny House
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2022-03-14 · elrod/baggett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Albert Elrod
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2021-04-28 · Elrod/Baggett · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Fred Scialabba
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7
L
2021-04-19 · Elrod/Baggett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Albert Elrod
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2021-04-07 · Elrod/Baggett · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kenneth Martin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2020-07-11 · albert elrod · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Glen Watford
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2019-05-16 · Martin 40 & Over · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Hirchak
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2019-04-30 · Martin 40 & Over · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Martin
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.5% of games
9.0
80%
8W–2L · 59.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 79% of the time
#1 Doubles
79%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer