← Search

Donetta Shaner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Overland Park, KS
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 12W–30L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history42 matches
W
2026-05-22 · Elving, Beverly · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Riggins
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · Elving, Beverly · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-29 · Harkleroad, Irene · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Harkleroad
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-15 · Harkleroad, Irene · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-18 · Harkleroad, Irene · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sibley Frye
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2024-05-11 · Harkleroad, Irene · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2024-04-20 · Harkleroad, Irene · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Harkleroad
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-03-24 · Robertson, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Olson
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-01-21 · Robertson, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irene Harkleroad
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-03 · Harkleroad, Irene · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
L
2023-05-06 · Harkleroad, Irene · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Harkleroad
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-22 · Harkleroad, Irene · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Barnes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 38.4% of games
6.0
40%
4W–6L · 43.5% of games
7.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 33.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams