← Search

Deborah Pagliuca

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsburgh, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 4W–7L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history11 matches
W
2025-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Dejohn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Barowich
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Dejohn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-5, 0-1
L
2023-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Georgeann Mercer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2023-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2021-07-10 · Glen Creek - Yocca · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa McGrosky-Kleja
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
40%
4W–6L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer