← Search

Robert Jacobs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LAWRENCE, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 17W–10L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history27 matches
L
2026-10-17 · Reedy, Mark · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Reedy
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Reedy, Mark · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Harrison
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · Reedy, Mark · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Harrison
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · Reedy, Mark · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jan Claussen
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-07 · Reedy, Mark · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Harrison
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-13 · HOA/Claussen/55&over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russell Packard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-04-06 · HOA/Claussen/55&over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mitchell Bennett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-06-09 · Reedy, Mark · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Wilson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-06-08 · Reedy, Mark · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Jaimez
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-06-01 · Reedy, Mark · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Reedy
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-05-25 · Reedy, Mark · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Jay
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2023-05-18 · Reedy, Mark · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blake Baraban
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
64%
16W–9L · 52.6% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova