← Search

Lori Paglini

Boca Raton, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 56W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lori Paglini to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Veltri/Sasson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Haim Sasson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Dillon/Caruso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexis Besinaiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Angela Carnaghi / Sharlene Held
2026-06-10 · PEACH-Erfurt 55s 7.0 NW F1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Butkus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · Veltri/Sasson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Haim Sasson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-19 · Dillon/Caruso · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-03 · Veltri/Wank · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Veronica Wank
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-03-22 · Veltri/Wank · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-17 · Dillon/Caruso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-03-16 · Veltri/Sasson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Haim Sasson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-01-25 · Veltri/Wank · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-16 · Winner/Veltri/Wank · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-11-15 · Winner/Veltri/Wank · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.9% of games
4.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.3% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 54.3% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.8% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
48.4%
15W–16L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
36 matches
#6 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#5 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe