Search

Janine Paulson

CASTLE ROCK, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
41 matches · 23W–18L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
9%
down to 4.0
91%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 6% down · 94% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.12. Higher than today’s 4.11 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Janine has been a steady 4.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

4.04.5201920202026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
50%
5W–5L · 48% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 48.2% of games
9.0
75%
6W–2L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history41 matches
L
Carole Myser / Renee Marrotte
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Kuhle
0.055below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Kirsten Fatland / Kim Kouwabunpat
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer VanMeter
0.049below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Andrea Gillis / Laura Steenstra
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Bowen
0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Julie Brown / Kelly Edwards
2021-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Linda Anderson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 6-4
W
2021-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Xia Wu
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mary Jo Kallgren / Cynthia McPhee
2021-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Xia Wu
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-0
W
2020-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Hill
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-3, 6-2
L
2020-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Hill
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
L
Mike Robertson / Tanya O'Neilmixed
2020-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rudd McGarity
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2020-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rudd McGarity
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2020-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Ly
0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2020-02-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tami Oglesby
+0.007about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.