Jane Tabet
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
45 matches · 16W–29L · seasons 2018–2023
Match history45 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2023
3.5W Lobo-Anselmo
NNM 7.0 SV - Felice
NNM 7.0W HP - Delfrate
NNM 8.0 LOBO - Hwang
NNM/Dosher/65 & Over/7.0W
NNM 3.5W Lobo Club - Hwang
NNM 7.0MX NDB - Goldstein
NNM 7.0W JC - Goldstein
NNM 7.0W NDB-Lane
NNM 7.0W JC - Lane
NNM 3.5W Lobo - Hwang
NNM 4.0W Lobo - McCormick
NNM 7.0M TBD - Payne
NNM3.5W40_Hwang_Lobo
NNM4.0W40_Briganti_TCA
NNM3.5W40_James_HP
NNM4.0W18_Larrichio_JC
NNM4.0W40_Larrichio_JC
NNM7.0W65_Payne_JC
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.3% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 41% of games
7.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 46.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.