← Search

Jane Fluet

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mt Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 92W–95L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history187 matches
L
2026-11-02 · LCTA64/Kiggans/Snee Farm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Shimp
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-30 · LCTA54/Shimp/Snee Farm · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Shimp
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-19 · LCTA64/Kiggans/Snee Farm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Fifield
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-14 · LCTA64/Kiggans/Snee Farm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy McEachern
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-12 · LCTA64/Kiggans/Snee Farm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy McEachern
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-09 · #1 Doubles · with Deborah McFann
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-10-09 · #1 Doubles · with Jean Fifield
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-10-02 · LCTA54/Shimp/Snee Farm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy McEachern
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-09-25 · LCTA54/Shimp/Snee Farm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy McEachern
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-09-21 · LCTA64/Kiggans/Snee Farm · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Fifield
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · LCTA65/Kiggans/Snee Farm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dara Craven
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · LCTA65/Kiggans/Snee Farm · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Dudley
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
53.1%
78W–69L · 51.3% of games
4.0
26.7%
8W–22L · 39.4% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
36 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer