← Search

Marie Kim Lamb

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chesterfield, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
236 matches · 111W–125L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history236 matches
L
2026-09-26 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Leonetti championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-26 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Leonetti championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Leonetti championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Leonetti championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn Parrott
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-26 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Leonetti
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-24 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yini Chen
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · PEACH-Parrott 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lamers
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-13 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Leonetti
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · PEACH-Swiderski 65S 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yini Chen
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-29 · PEACH-Hartel 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Leonetti
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · PEACH-Parrott 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lamers
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
60%
9W–6L · 57.9% of games
3.5
59.6%
34W–23L · 51.8% of games
6.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.5% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
41.3%
26W–37L · 49.4% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 51.2% of games
7.0mixed
7.7%
1W–12L · 36.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal