← Search

Mike Gioia

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Schenectady, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 7W–18L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history25 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Northern: Bologna 8.0 Men’s 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Culotti
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-11 · Northern: Bologna 8.0 Men’s 65+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Bologna
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · Northern: Bologna 8.0 Men’s 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Bologna
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-23 · Cary 55+ 8.0 2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Farley
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-08-12 · Northern: Cary 55 8.0 Men · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald McGoldrick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-07 · 55 9.0 Men · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mark Culotti
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-22 · Northern: Cary 55 8.0 Men · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald McGoldrick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-17 · 55 9.0 Men · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with William DeSantis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-08-17 · Gemme 55+ 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Igor Lednev
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-08-01 · Gemme 55+ 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald McGoldrick
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-25 · Gemme 55+ 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Culotti
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-19 · Gemme 55+ 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Culotti
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 42.8% of games
9.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer