← Search

Jennifer Linn Howard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 93W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history131 matches
W
Default
2026-08-02 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Drew Freeman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-28 · Bayer/LF 9.0 40sX · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-26 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · Bayer/LF 9.0 40sX · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · Bayer/LF 9.0 40sX · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Arens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-06-10 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Tulsa/Howard/18&over9.0X · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregory Kopervos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · Bayer/LF 9.0 40sX · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Arens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-23 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-09 · Howard/LF HIGH TRI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lina Wollmershauser
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 25% of games
4.5
91.7%
44W–4L · 69.4% of games
5.0
50%
2W–2L · 56.2% of games
5.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.3% of games
9.0mixed
60.4%
29W–19L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert