← Search

Tim Hester

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CENTENNIAL, CO
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
106 matches · 70W–36L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history106 matches
L
2026-09-09 · LTFC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Collins championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-08 · LTFC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Collins championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-28 · LTFC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Collins
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · LTFC YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Pascucci
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-15 · LTFC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Best
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · LTFC YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Collins
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · LTFC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Chalk
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-12 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Chalk
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-10 · LTFC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Whitmer
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Longcope
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Hatfield
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Hatfield
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
62.8%
27W–16L · 55.1% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.8% of games
8.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 62.1% of games
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 27% of the time
Singles
27%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
8%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer