← Search

Hilton Gottschalk

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Austin, TX
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 5W–7L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history12 matches
L
2026-09-27 · Casual Sets · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Priestner mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · Casual Sets · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Priestner mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-02-15 · Casual Sets · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Squires mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-11-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Tierney
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Patterson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-10-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Schlesinger
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Rogers
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-02-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Foster
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-02-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Shepard
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jessica Heggen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Mulvihill mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2023-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jessica Heggen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer