← Search

Bob Bolger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Aurora, CO
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 15W–34L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history49 matches
L
2026-07-21 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Kyker
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-07 · DTC RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Visciano
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Visciano
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · DTC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Cleveland
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-22 · DTC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Suter
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-30 · DTC SILVER · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Slosky
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-09 · DTC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barney Wilson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-14 · PCRK YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Naylor
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-31 · PCRK YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Pinkerton
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2024-07-10 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Naylor
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-26 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raghav Mathur
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-19 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Claxton
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.5% of games
4.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 36.5% of games
8.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
9 matches
Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe