← Search

Kathy Swanson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 70W–32L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history102 matches
L
2026-10-21 · 2026 Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Sullivan
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · 2026 Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Sullivan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-10-14 · 2026 Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Bryan
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-09 · 2026 Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Sullivan
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-10-22 · NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Sanchez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-15 · NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Postel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-09-24 · NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Schoonover Jones
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-09-22 · NNM Adult 65 & Over 8.0W Sanchez - JC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Schoonover Jones
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-10-02 · NNM 7.0W Worth - Tanoan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Filliman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-10-01 · NNM/Sanchez/65 & Over/8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-09-25 · NNM 7.0W Worth - Tanoan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-09-19 · NNM/Sanchez/65 & Over/8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janet Smith
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
78.2%
43W–12L · 60.5% of games
4.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.4% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 57.7% of games
8.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 60.1% of games
9.0
0%
0W–6L · 29.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
28 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe