← Search

Kenneth Brinker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Granger, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 47W–49L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history96 matches
W
2026-07-27 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Levy
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Wolff
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Lee
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · NIN SB 55&O 7.0 M: SBRC Janson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Janson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
Default
2026-07-13 · NIN SB 55&O 8.0 M: LP Toner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Farabaugh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · NIN SB 55&O 7.0 M: SBRC Janson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brent Wolff
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · NIN SB 55&O 8.0 M: LP Toner · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Fenton
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-01 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 M: LP Gogola/Cincoski · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Wise
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · NIN SB 55&O 7.0 M: SBRC Janson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Lee
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-29 · NIN SB 40&O 3.5 M: LP Janson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Pickering
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · NIN SB 40&O 4.0 M: LP Chung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Chung
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · NIN SB 55&O 7.0 M: SBRC Janson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Danas Lapkus
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.2% of games
4.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 40.4% of games
7.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 69% of games
8.0
52%
13W–12L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova