← Search

Carol Fitzpatrick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oxford, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 18W–37L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-07-31 · BT-Berguer 65s 7.0 DW · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Constance Carr
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-28 · WESS-Strasser 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Mick
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · WESS-Strasser 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terri Griffin
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · BT-Berguer 65s 7.0 DW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan Epstein
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · WESS-Strasser 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Mick
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · WESS-Strasser 55s 7.0 NW F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Mick
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-05 · BT-Berguer 65s 7.0 DW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Flancbaum
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-26 · WESS-Strasser 40s 3.5 DW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vicki Lee
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-15 · 3BT-BERGUER 70DW FRI 65&O SEM · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Chase
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-07 · 6DEER-GIBBS 70DW TH 55&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Huttenlocher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-18 · 3BT-BERGUER 70DW FRI 65&O SEM · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Burgam
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-10 · 6DEER-GIBBS 70DW TH 55&O SEM F3 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doris Gaviglio
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
30.8%
12W–27L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams