← Search

Nancy Lambrechts

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Beverly, MA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 8W–4L · seasons 2021–2023
Match history12 matches
L
2023-08-10 · BGT:Beverly Golf & Tennis:Hartnett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peggy Dixon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-06-29 · BGT:Beverly Golf & Tennis:Hartnett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Rawlsky Willett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2023-06-22 · BGT:Beverly Golf & Tennis:Hartnett · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barbara Rawlsky Willett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2021-08-10 · NewEngland/Hartnett/65&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Penny Pounder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2021-08-03 · NewEngland/Hartnett/65&Over8.0W · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Penny Pounder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2021-07-20 · NewEngland/Hartnett/65&Over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bernice Hartnett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-1
L
2021-06-02 · NE:Northeast TC:Hartnett/Trotta · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Feeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-6, 0-1
W
2021-05-18 · NE:Northeast TC:Hartnett/Trotta · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Feeney
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2021-05-04 · NE:Northeast TC:Hartnett/Trotta · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elaine Stilianos
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2021-04-27 · NE:Northeast TC:Hartnett/Trotta · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paula Spencer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2020-08-18 · NE:Northeast:Hartnett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Penny Pounder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2020-08-14 · NE:Northeast:Hartnett · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Penny Pounder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 62.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams