← Search

Jessica Zaganczyk van der Mije

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mount Pleasant, SC
5.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
32 matches · 7W–25L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history32 matches
L
2026-10-25 · LCTA (B) 9.5W 18 & Over (Richey) · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Kimberly Faust
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-25 · LCTA (B) 9.5W 18 & Over (Richey) · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Sara Youngner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-24 · LCTA (B) 9.5W 18 & Over (Richey) · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Tessa Radziej
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-26 · CTC Richey · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Kimberly Faust
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-26 · CTC Richey · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Kimberly Faust
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-25 · CTC Richey · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Kimberly Faust
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-25 · CTC Richey · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Kimberly Faust
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
Jessica Zaganczyk Van Der Mije
2023-10-08 · Singles · with Francisca Chambers tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
Jessica Zaganczyk Van Der Mije
2023-10-07 · Singles · with Arden Reynolds tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
Jessica Zaganczyk Van Der Mije
2023-10-06 · Singles · with Chiara Cavaggion tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2023-05-23 · LCTA40/Bumgarner/MPR · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Charles Claus mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2020-03-01 · L40PM - I'On 4.5 40 & Over · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 75.4% of games
9.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40% of games
9.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 59% of the time
Singles
59%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal