← Search

Janet Wells

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 21W–25L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history46 matches
W
2026-10-18 · Williams Y - Ciesla · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Grace Costello
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-11 · Williams Y - Ciesla · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Maryse Hotchkiss
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-27 · Williams Y - Ciesla · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Deborah Schaefer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-08 · Boone Park Ciesla · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tanya Reimschissel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-27 · Boone Park Ciesla · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Grace Costello
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
Sue Levin / Catherine Bauman
2024-12-07 · Ciesla/55&Over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Grace Costello
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2024-11-16 · Ciesla/55&Over9.0W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ellen Dyal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-11-10 · Ciesla/55&Over9.0W · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Maryse Hotchkiss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-19 · Ciesla/55&Over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Helen Ciesla
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-09-22 · PVIC - Saig · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Addison Crenshaw
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-09-21 · Ciesla/55&Over9.0W · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Grace Costello
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-6
L
2024-08-31 · PVIC - Saig · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joann Welborn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.9% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 50.9% of games
9.0
47.6%
10W–11L · 52.6% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe