← Search

Maurice Russell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Milwaukee, WI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 61W–79L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history140 matches
L
2026-10-25 · WI Adult 65&O 8.0M GML Mckinley Russell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Mandel championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-24 · WI Adult 65&O 8.0M GML Mckinley Russell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Mandel championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-26 · WI Adult 65&O 8.0M GML Mckinley Russell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Mandel
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · WI Adult 65&O 8.0M GML Mckinley Russell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Mandel
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
Default
2026-07-21 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML Mckinley Park Russell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Liebman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · WI Adult 65&O 8.0M GML Mckinley Russell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Mandel
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML Mckinley Park Russell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Liebman
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML Mckinley Park Russell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerald Powers
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML Mckinley Park Russell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Liebman
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-07-29 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML Riverside Russell · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerald Powers
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-22 · WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML Riverside Russell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Katzban
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-17 · WI Adult 40&O 4.0M GML McKinley Marina Feiss · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Davis
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
42.1%
32W–44L · 48.7% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 56.7% of games
8.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games
8.0mixed
24.1%
7W–22L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
41%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams