← Search

Marc Stingley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Paul, MN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 88W–46L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history134 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Humann 9.0 ES27 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jodi Schley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-10-14 · Swanson/Tatge 2k27 ES · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trace Combs
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-11 · Humann 9.0 ES27 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jacqueline Dutot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · Gleason: Ice, Rest and Pain Meds · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Cychosz
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · Gleason: Ice, Rest and Pain Meds · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Herding
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · Gleason: Ice, Rest and Pain Meds · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Gleason
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · Gleason: Ice, Rest and Pain Meds · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Gleason
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · Swanson/Tatge 2k26Winter · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Austin Seaverson
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-02-22 · Humann 9.0 Winter · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jodi Schley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · Humann 9.0 Winter · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-18 · Swanson/Tatge 2k26Winter · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Larson Ringlien
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-13 · Humann 9.0 Winter · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jennifer Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
74%
57W–20L · 56.6% of games
5.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.2% of games
9.0mixed
58.8%
30W–21L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert