← Search

Heyward Bouknight

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 51W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heyward Bouknight to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
L
2026-08-24 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sam Skaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christopher Chandler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · PBlandford (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Dukes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Helman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-07-08 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Helman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-06 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-24 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Helman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Dukes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Blandford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · DBarden (Mountainbrook) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 61.1% of games
3.5
61.8%
34W–21L · 54.8% of games
4.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.5% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 42.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 26% of the time
#3 Doubles
26%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Singles
17%
15 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe