← Search

Kathy Courage

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Virginia Bch, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 27W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Aston · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gaye Benson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Aston · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christina Bartholomew
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Aston · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Flurry Yanez
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Aston · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Flurry Yanez
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · Aston · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christina Bartholomew
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026! · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Molly Nissman
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026! · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shelley Smith
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026! · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Carina Simpson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026! · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Molly Nissman
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026! · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shelley Smith
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-07 · Nissman - Wild Tennis Women 2026! · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacey Shiflet
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-09 · Nissman - Wild Tennis Women · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stacey Shiflet
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 44.8% of games
4.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.8% of games
7.5
0%
0W–5L · 36.1% of games
8.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.7% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 42.1% of games
9.0
15.4%
4W–22L · 36.5% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer