← Search

Julia Deflavis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Hope, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 9W–12L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history21 matches
W
2026-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Keleman championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Silverman championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Silverman championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · PATD/Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Silverman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · PATD/Golden Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Silverman
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
Default
2026-07-29 · PATD/Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Silverman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-11 · PATD/Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Keleman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · PATD/Golden Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Silverman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-08-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Silverman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-08-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda McCann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janice Newman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-5, 1-0
L
2025-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda McCann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova