← Search

Dennis Reblin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Antonio, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 9W–3L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2026-05-31 · AHLXV+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecil Eager
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · AHLXV+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Harrison Bowes
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-04 · CRASH LXV Plus · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Mueller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-04-24 · CRASH LXV Plus · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecil Eager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-13 · CRASH LXV Plus · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecil Eager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-05-12 · BLOSSOM CRASH · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Mueller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-05-05 · BLOSSOM CRASH · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Nabers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-04-14 · BLOSSOM CRASH · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecil Eager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2021-07-25 · Alamo Heights LXV · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Calvin Mein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
Tony Angeleri / Jack Thomas
2021-06-19 · Alamo Heights LXV · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Randall Singleton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
L
2021-05-02 · Alamo Heights LXV · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Sethness
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
W
2019-05-05 · Mighty Mights · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cecil Eager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 59% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King