← Search

Virginia Gamble

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 60W–83L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history143 matches
W
2026-06-16 · WC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juli Simmermon
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · WC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol McGaughey
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · WC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juli Simmermon
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-05-21 · WC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Wiedeman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-07 · WC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Masur
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · WC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juli Simmermon
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-06 · LTFC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Fuller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-07-23 · LTFC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Fuller
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-07-09 · LTFC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erin Broerman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-07-02 · LTFC ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Noonan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-09-05 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kyle Davis
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-08-29 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Linhardt
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
40.4%
36W–53L · 47.1% of games
7.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.3% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.7% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
2W–12L · 40.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
35 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer