← Search

Jean Caudle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sarasota, FL
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
100 matches · 57W–43L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history100 matches
L
2024-02-19 · Payne Park Lacroix · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Wuelfing
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-01-22 · Payne Park Lacroix · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Wuelfing
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-06-02 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Allerton
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-01 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-25 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2023-05-18 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-11 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-05-04 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-04-27 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-04-20 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-04-13 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-03-30 · Payne Park Allerton · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52%
13W–12L · 50.6% of games
4.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.5% of games
7.0
73.1%
38W–14L · 59.8% of games
8.0
25%
2W–6L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
49 matches
#1 Singles
21%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams