← Search

Beverly Swimm

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
ALBANY, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
236 matches · 132W–104L · seasons 2018–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history236 matches
W
2026-11-01 · Saturday Night Sets - 18+ · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Vaughan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-25 · 7.0mxd18 Raffa · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Willem Blindenbach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-24 · Smith 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ali Albaker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-10-04 · 7.0mxd18 Raffa · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Willem Blindenbach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · 7.0W55 Raffa · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Doherty
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-16 · Northern: Falcone · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hillary Cooley championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · Northern: Falcone · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hillary Cooley championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · Northern: Falcone · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Bollacker championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · Northern: Falcone · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annette Grajny championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · Northern: Tennis Crush · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hillary Cooley championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · Northern: Tennis Crush · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shikha Raturi championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · 7.0W55 Raffa · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Dygert
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
75%
15W–5L · 58.4% of games
4.5
50%
27W–27L · 49.2% of games
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games
7.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.4% of games
8.0
76.3%
29W–9L · 59.3% of games
9.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 34.5% of games
7.0mixed
75.9%
22W–7L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
39.3%
11W–17L · 47.3% of games
9.0mixed
48.6%
17W–18L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal