← Search

Steve Willoughby

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Longboat Key, FL
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
7 matches · 7W–0L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history7 matches
W
2024-02-25 · Sarasota/Amero/55&Over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Phillip Mihm
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-02-25 · Sarasota/Amero/55&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Phillip Mihm
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-04-10 · Sarasota - Palm Aire/Mihm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Glorius
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2022-03-27 · Sarasota - Palm Aire/Mihm · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Thomas Cail
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2021-02-21 · Sarasota - Cedars/King · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Glorius
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-4
W
2021-01-31 · Sarasota - Cedars/King · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Capazola
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2021-01-24 · Sarasota - Cedars/King · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Glorius
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
9.0
100%
7W–0L · 70.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer