← Search

Jan Thompson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bakerstown, PA
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 12W–9L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history21 matches
W
2026-08-07 · Acing Gracefully · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Mueller
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Acing Gracefully · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Floy Pease
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria King
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
2022-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Buczek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2021-08-19 · Oxford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Kushner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2021-08-11 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Dachille
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
Mary Seip / Rhonda White
2021-08-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Buczek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2021-06-29 · Oxford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brenda Nigh
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2021-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernie Brown
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2021-06-11 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Polly Burkhard
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
Polly Whitehorn / Marlene Schrader
2021-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Buczek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2019-08-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Rausch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.3% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe