← Search

Karen Lovejoy

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Aurora, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
295 matches · 153W–142L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history295 matches
W
2026-10-24 · NEO/Lockert/A65&Over6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Paul championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-10-23 · NEO/Lockert/A65&Over6.0W · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Paul championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-17 · X55 6.0 CV2 Poe · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paul Boland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-09-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Paul championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Paul championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Paul championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-30 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Paul championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dina Fisher championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · 55 7.0W E CV Prindle · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Carroll
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-16 · A55 6.0W CV1 Fisher · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jo Paul
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · A65 7.0W CV Lovejoy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Prindle
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-13 · A40 3.0W CV2 Urbanowski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Benedejcic
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
65%
13W–7L · 56.9% of games
3.5
39.7%
23W–35L · 46.1% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
76.7%
56W–17L · 58.9% of games
6.5
25.9%
7W–20L · 40.2% of games
7.0
43.8%
35W–45L · 46% of games
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.8% of games
6.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.5% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
116 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
71 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova