← Search

Sara Gregerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
4.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 58W–53L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history111 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Basham-Simpson (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shepard Simpson
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-18 · Basham-Simpson (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Runge
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-04 · Basham-Simpson (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Linda Lord-Schaaf
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-03-08 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paula Douglass
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-01 · STLWC/Basham-Simpson/18&Over4.5W · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sara Runge
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · Basham/Simpson (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Abbie Bradley
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-09-14 · Basham/Simpson (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shepard Simpson
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-2, 1-0
L
2024-08-11 · Gregerson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Armstrong mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-09 · Gregerson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Armstrong mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-2
W
2023-09-06 · Fry · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caitlin Winey
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-08-28 · Fry · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Cox
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2023-08-15 · STL/Gregerson-Crawford/40&Over8.0MXD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Armstrong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
6W–6L · 50.2% of games
4.0
90.3%
28W–3L · 60.9% of games
4.5
30.3%
10W–23L · 43.6% of games
9.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.1% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal