← Search

Ann Brown

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bethlehem, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 8W–23L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history31 matches
L
2025-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mona Siwiec
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Riddle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Ulrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Eichman
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-16 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Louise Bowman
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Merry Krauz
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-05 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Fitton
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-12-08 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jayme Kerr
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2023-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Westhuis
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2023-03-31 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jayme Kerr
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2023-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Laputka
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-5
W
2022-12-02 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Lyons
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 34.5% of games
8.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 36.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer