← Search

Suzanne Malmstrom

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 109W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Malmstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history221 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Hit It From the Backhand · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rick Roby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Mallory
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-03 · Forever Smashed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-27 · Forever Smashed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-26 · Hit It From the Backhand · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Anders mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Malmstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Forever Smashed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Oddonetto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Malmstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Malmstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Malmstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · Midcourt Crisis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Vargason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · Midcourt Crisis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Loria Sylvia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
62.9%
22W–13L · 55.8% of games
4.0
37.9%
22W–36L · 48.1% of games
7.0
61.5%
32W–20L · 54.5% of games
8.0
38.5%
10W–16L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.1% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert