← Search

Linda Kall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Selbyville, DE
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
38 matches · 12W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history38 matches
L
2026-06-14 · Bayside · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jackie Welch
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · Bayside · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sharon Penhallegon
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
Carmen Delgado / Claire Rock
2023-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maureen McKee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-07-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Grimes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with SARAH D ESCHENBURG
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Vitsorek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Stashak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Goldy Austen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Barton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2022-07-24 · Beach Babes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Arbo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
2022-07-17 · Beach Babes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Arbo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2022-07-12 · Beach Babes · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Arbo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
30%
3W–7L · 39.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams